Beta-Lactamase Fitness Costs: Bacterial Growth Rates (2013-2015)
| # | sampleName | growthRate | isolationDate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | R12359 | 0.00082 | 6/18/2013 |
| 2 | R12359 | 0.001 | 6/18/2013 |
| 3 | R12359 | 0.00095 | 6/18/2013 |
| 4 | R12359 | 0.00738 | 6/18/2013 |
| 5 | R12359 | 0.00095 | 6/18/2013 |
| 6 | R12359 | 0.00096 | 6/18/2013 |
| 7 | R12912 | 0.0751 | 6/25/2013 |
| 8 | R12912 | 0.05921 | 6/25/2013 |
| 9 | R12912 | 0.10369 | 6/25/2013 |
| 10 | R12912 | 0.08353 | 6/25/2013 |
| 11 | R12912 | 0.06986 | 6/25/2013 |
| 12 | R12912 | 0.05921 | 6/25/2013 |
| 13 | R12086 | 0.00821 | 6/27/2013 |
| 14 | R12086 | 0.0073 | 6/27/2013 |
| 15 | R12086 | 0.00747 | 6/27/2013 |
| 16 | R12086 | 0.00865 | 6/27/2013 |
| 17 | R12086 | 0.00878 | 6/27/2013 |
| 18 | R12086 | 0.0086 | 6/27/2013 |
| 19 | R13716 | 0.00712 | 7/3/2013 |
| 20 | R13716 | 0.00384 | 7/3/2013 |
| 21 | R13716 | 0.00701 | 7/3/2013 |
| 22 | R13716 | 0.00664 | 7/3/2013 |
| 23 | R13716 | 0.00557 | 7/3/2013 |
| 24 | R13716 | 0.00663 | 7/3/2013 |
| 25 | R13875 | 0.0026 | 7/3/2013 |
| 26 | R13875 | 0.00237 | 7/3/2013 |
| 27 | R13875 | 0.00009 | 7/3/2013 |
| 28 | R13875 | 0.00205 | 7/3/2013 |
| 29 | R13875 | 0.00229 | 7/3/2013 |
| 30 | R13875 | 0.00213 | 7/3/2013 |
| 31 | R14821 | 0.0071 | 7/15/2013 |
| 32 | R14821 | 0.00724 | 7/15/2013 |
| 33 | R14821 | 0.00819 | 7/15/2013 |
| 34 | R14821 | 0.00727 | 7/15/2013 |
| 35 | R14821 | 0.00578 | 7/15/2013 |
| 36 | R14821 | 0.00747 | 7/15/2013 |
| 37 | R16709 | 0.01094 | 8/8/2013 |
| 38 | R16709 | 0.01003 | 8/8/2013 |
| 39 | R16709 | 0.00156 | 8/8/2013 |
| 40 | R16709 | 0.00945 | 8/8/2013 |
| 41 | R16709 | 0.01022 | 8/8/2013 |
| 42 | R16709 | 0.00194 | 8/8/2013 |
| 43 | R16805 | 0 | 8/8/2013 |
| 44 | R16805 | 0 | 8/8/2013 |
| 45 | R16805 | 0 | 8/8/2013 |
| 46 | R16805 | 0 | 8/8/2013 |
| 47 | R16805 | 0 | 8/8/2013 |
| 48 | R16805 | 0 | 8/8/2013 |
| 49 | R16805 | 0.08641 | 8/8/2013 |
| 50 | R16805 | 0.087 | 8/8/2013 |
| 51 | R16805 | 0.09547 | 8/8/2013 |
| 52 | R16805 | 0.087 | 8/8/2013 |
| 53 | R16805 | 0.09537 | 8/8/2013 |
| 54 | R16805 | 0.07712 | 8/8/2013 |
| 55 | R16509 | 0.0088 | 8/13/2013 |
| 56 | R16509 | 0.00837 | 8/13/2013 |
| 57 | R16509 | 0.00868 | 8/13/2013 |
| 58 | R16509 | 0.00843 | 8/13/2013 |
| 59 | R16509 | 0.00912 | 8/13/2013 |
| 60 | R16509 | 0.00846 | 8/13/2013 |
| 61 | R17098 | 0.09595 | 8/13/2013 |
| 62 | R17098 | 0.0921 | 8/13/2013 |
| 63 | R17098 | 0.09066 | 8/13/2013 |
| 64 | R17098 | 0.09099 | 8/13/2013 |
| 65 | R17098 | 0.07366 | 8/13/2013 |
| 66 | R17098 | 0.08556 | 8/13/2013 |
| 67 | R17480 | 0.10624 | 8/16/2013 |
| 68 | R17480 | 0.10491 | 8/16/2013 |
| 69 | R17480 | 0.1025 | 8/16/2013 |
| 70 | R17480 | 0.10001 | 8/16/2013 |
| 71 | R17480 | 0.10404 | 8/16/2013 |
| 72 | R17480 | 0.10491 | 8/16/2013 |
| 73 | R17545 | 0.06855 | 8/17/2013 |
| 74 | R17545 | 0.10369 | 8/17/2013 |
| 75 | R17545 | 0.09903 | 8/17/2013 |
| 76 | R17545 | 0.10951 | 8/17/2013 |
| 77 | R17545 | 0.09798 | 8/17/2013 |
| 78 | R17545 | 0.00054 | 8/17/2013 |
| 79 | R17614 | 0.08987 | 8/19/2013 |
| 80 | R17614 | 0.0711 | 8/19/2013 |
| 81 | R17614 | 0.09249 | 8/19/2013 |
| 82 | R17614 | 0.09066 | 8/19/2013 |
| 83 | R17614 | 0.09249 | 8/19/2013 |
| 84 | R17614 | 0.08488 | 8/19/2013 |
| 85 | R17833 | 0.1094 | 8/21/2013 |
| 86 | R17833 | 0.08395 | 8/21/2013 |
| 87 | R17833 | 0.10767 | 8/21/2013 |
| 88 | R17833 | 0.10767 | 8/21/2013 |
| 89 | R17833 | 0.11146 | 8/21/2013 |
| 90 | R17833 | 0.10963 | 8/21/2013 |
| 91 | R17982 | 0.10289 | 8/23/2013 |
| 92 | R17982 | 0.10446 | 8/23/2013 |
| 93 | R17982 | 0.1052 | 8/23/2013 |
| 94 | R17982 | 0.10197 | 8/23/2013 |
| 95 | R17982 | 0.10714 | 8/23/2013 |
| 96 | R17982 | 0.10767 | 8/23/2013 |
| 97 | R18996 | 0.11 | 9/5/2013 |
| 98 | R18996 | 0.09564 | 9/5/2013 |
| 99 | R18996 | 0.09273 | 9/5/2013 |
| 100 | R18996 | 0.10792 | 9/5/2013 |
Beta-Lactamase Fitness Costs: Bacterial Growth Rates (2013-2015) — Analysis
About this dataset
This dataset, sourced from Zenodo (#4987501), documents the fitness consequences of beta-lactamase-mediated antibiotic resistance — a critical mechanism by which bacteria survive beta-lactam antibiotics like penicillin and cephalosporins. Across 1,284 measurements, bacterial growth rates under ceftazidime (CAZ) pressure were recorded, revealing a median growth rate of just 0.0029 per unit time and a striking range from near-zero (−0.0001) up to 0.13 — meaning the fastest-growing resistant strains grow roughly 45× faster than the median. Sixty outliers were flagged in the growth rate distribution (mean 0.01, σ=0.03), pointing to rare but highly fit resistant variants that could seed the spread of resistance in clinical or agricultural settings. The data underscores a key tension in antibiotic resistance biology: resistance mutations often impose metabolic penalties, yet selection pressure can rapidly surface high-fitness exceptions. Understanding which mutations escape that cost is essential for designing antibiotics and treatment regimens that are harder for pathogens to tolerate.
Fitness Cost Analysis
- 212 beta-lactamase-producing isolates were measured with 6 replicates each across 157 isolation dates (Jun 2013 to Mar 2015)
- The growth rate distribution is sharply bimodal: 120 isolates cluster below 0.005, while 23 isolates form a distinct fast-growing group above 0.05
- The middle range (0.01-0.05) is nearly empty with only 2 isolates, suggesting a fitness threshold rather than a continuum
- Fast growers are concentrated in summer months (Aug-Sep 2013, May-Jun 2014), while late 2014 and early 2015 isolates are almost exclusively slow growers
- The 3,000x growth rate difference between the fastest (R10399: 0.125) and slowest (R14933: 0.00004) isolates implies dramatically different fitness costs of resistance